Jellystone has the stones; The Owl House still struggles to come home to roost


(I’m still trying to figure out how to make titles work for these pieces.)

The Owl House screenshot
The Owl House

So I have a question about The Owl House. Was there an episode that, straight up, explained what the main nine witch covens actually are? I did some down-and-dirty research, and a wiki pointed out that the nine were mentioned in an episode call “Covention”. I re-watched “Covention”. They did not mention all nine covens. They mentioned one of the nine covens was “Construction,” which is structured around gaining magical strength, which is also an important plot point of the episode, but I don’t think the gaining of magical stretch is ever brought up again in the entire show. Which is weird, especially towards the end of season one where the magical fights escalate in stakes; no one bothers to use power-gaining to escalate in strength.

When The Owl House was first announced, I was quite looking forward to watching it. It had a really cool, nutty locale and the characters seemed fun and appealing. And don’t get me wrong, The Owl House is quite a fun show, but it also feels… well, perhaps not troubled, but restrained? Unsure of itself? There’s a pretty controversial piece of news about the show (which is subject to change I suppose): after this current second season, The Owl House will have one final third season, consisting of three episodes at about an hour and a half each. Even if you think Disney hates the show (which I don’t think they do, and in the next paragraph I’ll elaborate), this kind of decision is weird and unprecedented. It has the flavors of Netflix’s recent push to end some of its animated shows with movies instead of final seasons (Trollhunters, Hilda), but you can chalk that up to Netflix’s push for more affordable, quick content for weekly, new releases than whole-ass seasons. (They sort of did this with Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt, and not for nothing, but Arlo The Alligator Boy, a fine movie as is, probably would have worked better across ten episodes.)

I think there’s a lot going on with Disney, partially in relation to Disney+. I suspect, spitballing here, that the mandate to find “the next Gravity Falls” got usurped by the push for Disney+ content, and the pandemic sort of solidified that “Disney+ at all costs” notion. A lot of Twitter seem to think its due to a same-sex dating subplot (and I can’t dismiss that out of hand, as many shows have gotten royally screwed when same-sex narratives pop up), but my inclination is that the ratings, business realities, and poor timing left The Owl House on the chopping block. (I have a theory. If the most social media appeal of your show is a “ship,” your show actually on pretty shaky ground.)

The reason I asked about the nine covens at the beginning of this piece is because I feel like knowing what the nine covens are, and who leads them, and how, specifically, they work within the society of the Boiling Isles, would be pretty important to Luz, and The Owl House as a whole. I get that the show is structured from Luz’s point of view, but as an aspiring witch, knowing what those covens are should be a day one question from her (and I get that she’s not supposed to be a great student but still). This ought to be a pretty clear point that show reveals, to flavor the world better, but to also provide the audience some kind of through-line of the world itself. In “Eda’s Requiem,” we finally see the Bard Coven in action, way late in season two. That seems really late, too me.

(I’ve written before about Anne’s weird season one lack of desire to understand the world of Amphibia, and I feel like Luz and The Owl House come from the same place: an incomplete, unfinished understanding of the world each show has created. Same for Star Vs. The Forces of Evil. Something about the way these shows deal with magic is wild if you think about it. It’s simultaneously overly complex and weirdly simple. What makes those nine covens the main ones versus the others? When Star decided to “end all magic,” why was there so little pushback? I wrote about how strange it is that a telethapy-esque spell took several episodes to set up in The Dragon Prince. Magic used to be portrayed in clear, simple terms (point fingers or wands, say some nonsense, strain oneself a bit, flashing lights!). Sometimes you had to find objects or talismans or horcruxes or runes or “places imbued with special powers”. There’s so much going on with magic in these shows now that it’s bordering on distracting; I feel more and more like I have to understand the depth of these spells to understand the depth of these characters nowadays. I partially have the same feeling for Centaurworld, which I will tackle next week.)

Jellystone

Jellystone, otherwise, is fantastic, and it helps that C. H. Greenblatt is an extremely talented creator, and that the back roster of the sillier Hanna-Barbera cartoons are sketched so thinly that all the new, updated creative choices for these characters work so well. I had my doubts that making Yogi, Cindy, and Boo-Boo doctors/nurses was a good idea, but the core nature of these characters never changed: Yogi is still darkly gluttonous, Boo-Boo is reluctantly submissive, and Cindy… well, Cindy was more the straight-bear of reason; here, she can go toe-to-toe with Yogi on the absurd escalation scale. Greenblatt needed to situation these characters in occupations or locales to give them a broad purpose; the medical field is probably the simplest to utilize, since policing is persona non grata right now, and being a lawyer is probably to complicated to work with in a kids’ show (also its connection to policing).

Many people tend to say Jellystone has a lot of Chowder-type humor, Greenblatt’s first show, but I don’t think that’s true. The two shows have aesthetic similarities for sure, but Chowder was a bit more surreal, I think, and as much as I love that show, you can kind of tell by late in its run it was losing a bit of steam. The world of Chowder was well-drawn but rather limited: you can only do so much with a not-bright, gluttonous kid and his self-absorbed mentor, with an assortment of other weirdo characters to pad things out. Jellystone has a much richer world and character-base to pull from–Hanna-Barbara’s library is rich and varied, and Jellystone has only light touched what it can do with it. Greenblatt and his creative team can make some serious comic moves here (I already thought of two whole potential specs).

More well-known characters like Wally Gator and Snagglepuss, while present, are mere side characters to Jellystone’s heavy hitters like Shag, Augie/Daddy Doggy, and Captain Caveman, who you’d think would have been placed along side the more human characters (more or less used as random shopkeepers and store employees). Loopy gets some choice lines, and I don’t even remember her (well, his) older cartoons ever airing! Top Cat and his crew make splashes, and even the Banana Splits pop up as heavy hitters. Jellystone knows that it has some freedom to re-tool a batch of characters that didn’t exactly hold up well (in the fact that probably seventy percent of these Hanna-Barbera characters have been forgotten by most people). So just the idea that we could see some deep cut characters pop up and steal the show already provides Greenblatt with swaths of material that he lacked in both Chowder and Harvey Beaks.

I’ll probably dabble with the end of The Bad Batch next week, along with a few words about Centaurworld, because I have some stuff to say about that show.

Share

, , ,

  1. #1 by Rosemont on August 14, 2021 - 8:52 pm

    Nice to see you back, and great piece. “If the most social media appeal of your show is a ‘ship,’ your show is actually on pretty shaky ground.” I’m noticing this with a lot of these 2010s-2020s shows, particularly if they’re more girl-targeted, be it Star Vs or Miraculous Ladybug. The ships themselves are usually nothing to write home about – the blandest, most generic self-insert guy and girl protagonist who aren’t allowed to even get together until the last episode for the sake of easy Will-They-Won’t-They ratings.

    As for shows that substitute substance with “lore” and “vague, unfinished worldbuilding,” it seems creators want to be taken as seriously as classic epics like Lord of the Rings. Yet they do not want to have to go into live-action to be able to tell more mature stories (at least as far as what America considers kid-friendly compared to other countries like Japan).

    What used to be true about Disney, more specifically its animated films, is that the creators wanted their story as tight, easy to grasp, and compact as possible.

    Like Walt Disney and his crew tried to make Snow White a lot less plot heavy compared to its 1916 live-action counterpart and yet still had to cut entire scenes and wasted a third or so of it messing about in the forest with cleaning animals and dwarfs washing their hands. That film seemed a success for its time whereas Raya (despite having a “Strong female character” as its lead plus substantial fantasy Asian representation) had an overcomplicated plot and world with a bungled message about trust.

  2. #2 by MalcmanIsHere on August 18, 2021 - 4:25 pm

    Interesting review.

    Personally, having previous experience with Steven Universe and Gravity Falls, the lore isn’t that important, and will almost always be less interesting than what comes up in my head.

    Sadly, because of the way the industry is set up, a lot of western animation doesn’t have the same leverage as anime, where a show can be based on a long-running manga that has key points and lore set up that can be perfected (or at the very least be improved upon) in TV form.

    I remember when being in the SU fandom, episodes focused on characters outside of the overarching plot were looked down upon thanks to the absence of plot progression (nicknamed “townie episodes”). But upon rewatch, I’ve noticed a lot of fans have warmed up to them as they are important character moments.

    For me, the characters and type of humor are enough for me to keep me coming back to both Amphibia and The Owl House (something SVTFOE couldn’t do for me personally).

    In regards to Jellystone!, while I did enjoy the 20 episodes I saw for the most part, anyone’s enjoyment of the show will differ GREATLY based on how you see Hanna-Barbers as a cultural institution (this fair review from Jim of the Pizza Party Podcast I liked: https://youtu.be/d1EYbDkh5ig)

    Will be interested to see what you have to say on Centaurworld (don’t have the source ATM, but I read there was originally going to be 20 episodes, but it was then reduced to 10)

  3. #3 by Rosemont on August 19, 2021 - 9:20 am

    “If the most social media appeal of your show is a ‘ship,’ your show actually on pretty shaky ground.” So true, and it’s a thing particularly for girl-targeted shows like Star vs and Miraculous Ladybug. It’s always between the blandest, most generic male and female stand-ins for protagonists too. It’s the latest iteration of the tired “Will-They-Won’t They” crud – “keep watching and maybe you’ll find out if they get together!” But the real question is, why is this the new trend in American cartoons, aside from an obsession with incomplete, in-the-works lore and worldbuilding?

  4. #4 by PhilingMyself on August 26, 2021 - 8:05 pm

    First off, Welcome Bacck. It’s good to see you review again. And continue knocking some shows down a peg.

    Second, on your regards to Jellystone! I’ve seen the cameos such as the Neptunes and Teen Angels.

    I’ve been asking myself. What does THIS show does right with cameos and what Mystery Incorporated did wrong with cameos. (Mystery Solvers State Club Finals, Heart of Evil and that Film-Flam and Scrappy Doo cameo in Screams of Siren).

    And I think I get it.

    The characters here feel Fresh and New. Which I think helps this show a lot. A chance to Retool them rather than try to entertain fanboys for Nostalgia purposes. See. I was AGAINST the whole Gender Bender thing with the characters. But after watching how they’re retooled into different characters. I’m enjoying it.

    While Mystery Incorporated as you said earlier. Just threw cameos to just appeal to nostalgia fans and never even used them.

    Like what was the point? Because it doesn’t fit the story. It just felt like a joke the writers threw in to make that nostalgic fan excited for two seconds.

    Teen Angels would have various jobs through the series and it works for this kinda world. Where something like Mystery Incorporated would just do a cameo to excite fans who want to see a reference.

    Makes perfect sense.

  1. URL

Comments are closed.